A generalisation of Nash’s theorem with higher-order functionals

This is my first paper, written in the first few months of my Ph.D. and published quickly. Four and a half years later it is still technically my best paper by the usual (wrong) metrics. Obviously now I wouldn’t dare to do something as outrageous as submitting a paper to such a highly-ranked journal.

The paper defines a special case of higher-order simultaneous games for which mixed strategies can be defined, and to which the usual proof of Nash’s existence theorem (by the Kakutani fixpoint theorem) still applies.

The main theorem of this paper makes strong assumptions, which have prevented it from being useful. My best guess now is that the proper generalisation of Nash’s theorem to selection functions uses the composition of the selection monad with the finitary probability monad, with outcomes in a convex space. (I don’t know whether there is a fixpoint theorem for general convex spaces.)

The only nontrivial example, the ‘closed ball’ selection function, makes another appearance in Higher-order decision theory, where it is related to satisficing.

The only thing from this paper that I still like are the ‘unilateral maps’, which turned out to be useful for reasoning about higher order games. They appear again in Selection equilibria of higher order games and Towards compositional game theory, and are also closely related to continuations of open games.

Also, the copy editor for the Royal Society made a mess of Her Majesty’s language, including in the title.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s